[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100117092221.2fca789c@nehalam>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 09:22:21 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] rps: Receive Packet Steering
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:11:33 +0000
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 14:56 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:56:23 -0800 (PST)
> > Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > > The CPU masks is set on a per device basis in the sysfs variable
> > > /sys/class/net/<device>/rps_cpus. This is a set of canonical bit maps for
> > > each NAPI nstance of the device. For example:
> > >
> > > echo "0b 0b0 0b00 0b000" > /sys/class/net/eth0/rps_cpus
> >
> > Why not make a kobject out of cpus which would add subdirectory.
> > This would keep interface consistent with the one value per file
> > semantic of sysfs.
>
> Do you mean a kobject per NAPI context, each initially with a rps_cpus
> attribute holding a CPU mask, or a kobject per CPU, each with an
> attribute specifying which NAPI contexts it does work for? (Personally
> I'd favour the first.)
Yes, make NAPI real kobjects, linked to device.
BUT
make sure this also handles case of N to 1 mapping as well
as 1 to N case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists