netdev - Re: [PATCH][XFRM] Use the simple name when adding SAD with ip xfrm state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100119.003041.193317921.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:30:41 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	lyw@...fujitsu.com
Cc:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][XFRM] Use the simple name when adding SAD with ip xfrm
 state

From: Li Yewang <lyw@...fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:25:22 +0800

> 
> 
> Herbert Xu wrote:
>> Li Yewang <lyw@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>> The encryption name such as "rfc3686(ctr(aes))" is too complex.
>>> I think simple name is better for user when using "ip xfrm state ..." command.
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Li Yewang <lyw@...fujitsu.com>
>> 
>> Nack.  If we want to support simple names such as these, they
>> should be done in the crypto layer.  Otherwise every crypto user
>> that wants this would have to reinvent it.
> 
>   But user sets SAD for ipsec with "ip xfrm state ..." must use the name such as "rfc3686(ctr(aes))".
>   Is that reasonable? Maybe user can not remember this complex name.
> 
>   There are some simple names for other encryptions, 
>   such as "cbc(blowfish)", you can use "ip xfrm state ... enc blowfish ...".

You're not reading what Herbert is saying.

He's fine with the shorter name, he just wants you to implement
is in the crypto layer core instead of the XFRM specific code.

That way all crypto users will benefit from the shorter naming.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html