| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4B55EEC6.4070402@hp.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:41:26 -0800 From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com> To: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com> CC: davem@...emloft.net, eric.dumazet@...il.com, ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Optimize TCP sendmsg in favour of fast devices? Krishna Kumar2 wrote: > Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com> wrote on 01/15/2010 11:43:06 PM: >>Multiple process tests may not be as easy in netperf as it is in >>iperf, but under: >> >>ftp://ftp.netperf.org/netperf/misc >> >> I have a single-stream test script I use called runemomni.sh and an >> example of its output, as well as an aggregate script I use called >> runemomniagg2.sh - I'll post an example of its output there as >> soon as I finish some runs. > > > I usually run netperf for smaller number of threads and aggregate > the output using some scripts. I will try what you suggested above, > and see if I can get consistent results for higher number of > processes. Thanks for the links. You're welcome - the output of the aggregate script is up there too now - generally I run three systems for the aggregate tests and then include the TCP_MAERTs stuff, but in this case since I had only two otherwise identical systems, TCP_MAERTs would have been redundant. rick jones -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists