[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100121.180311.228791894.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:03:11 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: wg@...ndegger.com
Cc: agust@...x.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org, dzu@...x.de, wd@...x.de,
jcrigby@...il.com, kosmo@...ihalf.com, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 2/3] fs_enet: Add support for MPC512x to
fs_enet driver
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:25:38 +0100
> Do you see a more clever solution to this problem?
See how we handle this in the ESP scsi driver. We have a set of
defines for the register offsets, and a set of methods a chip driver
implements for register accesses.
If the offsets differ, the register access method can translate the
generic register offsets into whatever layout their implementation
actually uses.
> Nevertheless, the code could be improved by using "offsetof", I
> think.
At a minimum :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists