netdev - Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/7] ixgbe: Set the correct pool when VLANs are added in SR-IOV mode.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100123.011415.133422524.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 23 Jan 2010 01:14:15 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, gregory.v.rose@...el.com
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/7] ixgbe: Set the correct pool when
 VLANs are added in SR-IOV mode.

From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:45:43 -0800

> From: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
> 
> When VFs are allocated (as indicated by adapter->num_vfs is non-zero) then
> the PF pool is no longer zero.  Instead it will be the same as the number
> of VFs allocated.  When setting the VLVF entry for the PF we need to use
> the correct pool otherwise the PF will get VLAN packets from the wire
> because the packet will pass VFTA filtering and the PF has the default
> pool, but it will not get VLAN packets from the VFs because it has
> not set the correct pool bit in the VLVF entry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html