[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100125083006.47fd2f7e@nehalam>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:30:06 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp_probe: avoid modulus operation and wrap fix
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:41:22 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:50:01 -0800
>
> > @@ -75,12 +75,12 @@ static struct {
> >
> > static inline int tcp_probe_used(void)
> > {
> > - return (tcp_probe.head - tcp_probe.tail) % bufsize;
> > + return (tcp_probe.head - tcp_probe.tail) & (bufsize - 1);
> > }
> >
> > static inline int tcp_probe_avail(void)
> > {
> > - return bufsize - tcp_probe_used();
> > + return bufsize - tcp_probe_used() - 1;
> > }
> >
> > /*
>
> Hmmm... When the ring is full head==tail, which means
> tcp_probe_used() returns 0. Which would now make tcp_probe_avail()
> return "bufsize - 0 - 1".
>
> Is that right?
Yes. in this ring; empty is head == tail, and full needs to
be tail == head - 1.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists