[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100125.180357.109302552.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:03:57 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fubar@...ibm.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Netlink usage question (for bonding comm with userspace)
From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:14:00 -0800
> Just so I'm clear, though: use generic netlink for the needs of
> this particular project, and then later it's acceptable to have both
> generic and rtnetlink co-existing for their respective uses?
Use generic netlink for everything.
It's just a different namespace ("text strings", vs. fixed integer
IDs) for netlink sockets, nothing more really.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists