[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1001260957540.17103@melkinpaasi.cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:41:56 +0200 (EET)
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: damian@....rwth-aachen.de, denys@...p.net.lb,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: fix ICMP-RTO war
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, David Miller wrote:
> From: Damian Lukowski <damian@....rwth-aachen.de>
> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:07:43 +0100
>
> > @@ -530,7 +530,11 @@ static inline void tcp_bound_rto(const struct sock *sk)
> >
> > static inline u32 __tcp_set_rto(const struct tcp_sock *tp)
> > {
> > - return (tp->srtt >> 3) + tp->rttvar;
> > + u32 rto = (tp->srtt >> 3) + tp->rttvar;
> > + if (unlikely(rto < TCP_RTO_MIN))
> > + return TCP_RTO_MIN;
> > + else
> > + return rto;
> > }
>
> The min RTO is now a runtime variable, TCP_RTO_MIN is merely the
> default, so we should use tcp_rto_min() for obtaining that value.
>
> And if we make this change, we might want to delete the comment in
> tcp_set_rto() which claims:
>
> /* NOTE: clamping at TCP_RTO_MIN is not required, current algo
> * guarantees that rto is higher.
> */
> tcp_bound_rto(sk);
>
> And we have shown here at least one case where that is not true.
> :-)
I went through some history, it seems that this comment about the lower
bound originates from Alexey [1]:
commit 893e1302654a9bcdc0e7d9ac95159657a8f5e0e8
Author: davem <davem>
Date: Wed Dec 13 04:10:12 2000 +0000
Fix numerous RTO bugs.
Withdraw CWR when DSACKs are seen.
Do not allow recvmsg on unbound socket, it is
senseless.
All from Alexey.
> I've looked at Denys's traces and your analysis, and I still
> can't figure out who the true culprit is that lets us get into
> such a state that RTO is evaluated so low...
--
i.
[1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/netdev-vger-cvs.git;a=commit;h=893e1302654a9bcdc0e7d9ac95159657a8f5e0e8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists