lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:27:42 +0100 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...-begemot.co.uk> Cc: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: CBQ broken in 2.6 Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 à 19:48 +0000, Anton Ivanov a écrit : > Well, I know CBQ reasonably well from a "network engineer" perspective. > I used to run it production in an ISP 1998 and after that in an SMB > 2002-2007. I have also been running it in lab and on my home network for > 10+ years. Mostly on BSD though. There was even a point where I > maintained a fork of the patches before they went into the main tree. > The sole reason I ditched BSD was that they plugged it into the pf > framework and it became too big of a hassle to port/maintain the > configs. > > I know what I am doing and HTB is not what I want. It is a good algo for > expressing classic commerical relationships (CIR/PIR). It is worse than > CBQ for "sharing" where all of the apps that share are your own and the > scheduler/estimator is good. > > Thanks for all the help. I am using CBQ myself with recent kernels and never found it 'borrowing', could you post a copy of your rules, or better, a subset of them desmonstrating the problem ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists