[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1264714062.3380.20.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:27:42 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...-begemot.co.uk>
Cc: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CBQ broken in 2.6
Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 à 19:48 +0000, Anton Ivanov a écrit :
> Well, I know CBQ reasonably well from a "network engineer" perspective.
> I used to run it production in an ISP 1998 and after that in an SMB
> 2002-2007. I have also been running it in lab and on my home network for
> 10+ years. Mostly on BSD though. There was even a point where I
> maintained a fork of the patches before they went into the main tree.
> The sole reason I ditched BSD was that they plugged it into the pf
> framework and it became too big of a hassle to port/maintain the
> configs.
>
> I know what I am doing and HTB is not what I want. It is a good algo for
> expressing classic commerical relationships (CIR/PIR). It is worse than
> CBQ for "sharing" where all of the apps that share are your own and the
> scheduler/estimator is good.
>
> Thanks for all the help.
I am using CBQ myself with recent kernels and never found it
'borrowing', could you post a copy of your rules, or better, a subset of
them desmonstrating the problem ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists