netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio_net: Defer skb allocation in receive path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100129140553.GA4413@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:05:54 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio_net: Defer skb allocation in receive path

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 04:37:55PM -0800, Shirley Ma wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 00:48 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:23:48PM -0800, Shirley Ma wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 23:37 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > Yes, separate patch is best.
> > > 
> > > The send side patch is done, I will submit it when this patch has
> > > been reviewed. :)
> > 
> > 
> > Hey, why wait :)
> > 
> 
> Because: the send side patch is built on top of this patch and uses
> free_unused_bufs() func.
> 
> Thanks
> Shirley

Now that's in, how does the send patch look?

-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html