[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4B6356FF.7070504@tvk.rwth-aachen.de>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:45:35 +0100
From: Damian Lukowski <damian@....rwth-aachen.de>
To: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: fix ICMP-RTO war
Denys Fedoryshchenko schrieb:
> On Friday 29 January 2010 14:13:18 Damian Lukowski wrote:
>> Denys Fedoryshchenko schrieb:
>>> On Wednesday 27 January 2010 14:36:18 you wrote:
>>>> Unless they are for a different connection? We might have to print sk
>>>> (%p) in all those printouts to be sure which maps to which. If a peer
>>>> becomes unreachable, it may well have multiple connections open (this
>>>> was a proxy, iirc?).
>>> Ok i will try to do that today.
>>>
>>> Most probably different connections, on this proxy i have 10-15k
>>> established connections at peak time.
> http://www.nuclearcat.com/files/report1.txt
> http://www.nuclearcat.com/files/report2.txt
>
> Here with %p and sk.
Ok, thanks for testing.
So it is ec0f3440 causing the trouble. Are there still objections
on the lower bound check in __tcp_set_rto()? Well, I will submit
an updated patch and you can make comments there.
Regards
Damian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists