Message-ID: <4B661353.7060704@fr.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:33:39 +0100
From:	Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC:	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: macvlan on top mlx4 fails

Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to have a macvlan on top of an ethernet driver infiniband
>>>> emulation communicating with the macvlan on anoher host with the same
>>>> configuration. But I am not able to ping them through the ip address
>>>> assigned to each macvlan.
>>>>
>>>> On the host1 (s1):
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>> s2:~ # ping 1.2.3.5
>>>> PING 1.2.3.5 (1.2.3.5) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>>> From 1.2.3.4: icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>> From 1.2.3.4 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>> From 1.2.3.4 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>> From 1.2.3.4 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable
>>>> ^C
>>>> --- 1.2.3.5 ping statistics ---
>>>> 5 packets transmitted, 0 received, +4 errors, 100% packet loss, time
>>>> 4010ms
>>>> , pipe 3
>>>>
>>>> The arp cache:
>>>>
>>>> Address                  HWtype  HWaddress           Flags Mask    Iface
>>>> 1.2.3.5                          (incomplete)    mc1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When doing a tcpdump on s2 host, I have arp who-as request:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 09:14:20.764389 arp who-has 1.2.3.5 tell 1.2.3.4
>>>> 09:14:20.764394 arp who-has 1.2.3.5 tell 1.2.3.4
>>>> 09:14:20.764427 arp who-has 1.2.3.5 tell 1.2.3.4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But doing the same tcpdump on the s1 host I don't see there arp request.
>>>>
>>>> The output of lscpi:
>>>>
>>>> s2:~ # lspci
>>>> 0000:00:01.0 RAID bus controller: IBM Obsidian chipset SCSI controller
>>>> (rev 02)
>>>> 0001:00:01.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 43)
>>>> 0001:00:01.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 43)
>>>> 0001:00:01.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 04)
>>>> 0002:00:01.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc ES1000 (rev
>>>> 02)
>>>> 0003:01:00.0 InfiniBand: Mellanox Technologies MT25418 [ConnectX IB DDR,
>>>> PCIe 2.0 2.5GT/s] (rev a0)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am a newbie on infiniband so I was wondering if I did something wrong
>>>> or if this is unsupported.
>>> Well, I don't know much about infiniband myself. On which device
>>> are you running tcpdump? 
>> I did:
>>
>> tcpdump -i any arp dst or src 1.2.3.5
>>
>> In case its the eth-device, does running
>>> tcpdump directly on top of the ib-devices make any difference?
>> Yes, right. The arp request are seen on eth1 but not on the ib.
> 
> That would be fine unless I'm misunderstanding your setup - with
> macvlan bound to eth1 they should be visible on both eth1 any the
> macvlan device.
> 
> I'm guessing that you have a filter misconfiguration. You need
> arp_ignore=1 and possibly rp_filter=0.
> 
>>> Perhaps its not properly propagating the promiscous mode flag or
>>> the secondary unicast addresses.
>> Is it possible to check that ?
> 
> If the devices are not already in promiscous mode, you should see
> "device XXX entered promiscuous mode" for both devices in the
> ring buffer.

Hi patrick,

finally I was puzzled with the nic on the machines, they are not 
inifinband emulated ethernet but powerpc lpar virtual ethernet card.

It seems they drop the packets when the mac address is not the one 
assigned to the virtual ethernet :(

I am afraid macvlan neither veth or any virtual interface with its own 
mac address will be able to communicate between lpars. In other words, 
the lpar seems to be incompatible with the container technology today.

Thanks for your help.
   -- Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists