[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B673A0A.5080504@grandegger.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:31:06 +0100
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To: "Ira W. Snyder" <iws@...o.caltech.edu>
CC: "Pavel B. Cheblakov" <P.B.Cheblakov@....nsk.su>,
Socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 v2] can: add support for CAN interface cards based
on the PLX90xx PCI bridge
Ira W. Snyder wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:42:44AM +0600, Pavel B. Cheblakov wrote:
>> From: Pavel Cheblakov <P.B.Cheblakov@....nsk.su>
>>
>> This driver is for CAN interface cards based on the PLX90xx PCI bridge.
>> Driver supports now:
>> - Adlink PCI-7841/cPCI-7841 card (http://www.adlinktech.com/)
>> - Adlink PCI-7841/cPCI-7841 SE card
>> - Marathon CAN-bus-PCI card (http://www.marathon.ru/)
>> - TEWS TECHNOLOGIES TPMC810 card (http://www.tews.com/)
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Added some defines for static inline int plx_pci_check_sja1000(...)
>> - static struct pci_device_id plx_pci_tbl[] replaced by
>> static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(plx_pci_tbl)
>> - Typo fixed
>>
>
> Hello,
>
> Any ideas if this driver could support the Janz PCI CAN cards as well? I
> don't have any documentation for the cards, and I'd love to get away
> from their closed-source drivers.
Is it a passive or and intelligent CAN PCI card? What is the name of the
card? A intelligent card will run its own firmware and you do not have
direct access to the SJA1000. Pavel plx_pci driver is quite generic and
it should not be a big deal to support a PLX90xx based passive card.
Wolfgang.
Wolfgang.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists