netdev - Re: [RFC Patch] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1265171993.3274.3.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Wed, 03 Feb 2010 05:39:53 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
	linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed
 port numbers

Le mardi 02 février 2010 à 23:30 -0500, Amerigo Wang a écrit :
> This patch introduces /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports,
> it can be used like ip_local_port_range, but this is used to
> reserve ports for third-party applications which use fixed
> port numbers within ip_local_port_range.
> 
> This only affects the applications which call socket functions
> like bind(2) with port number 0, to prevent the kernel getting the ports
> within the specified range for them. For applications which use fixed
> port number, it will have no effects.
> 
> Any comments are welcome.
> 
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@...hat.com>
> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>

>  		.procname	= "igmp_max_memberships",
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index f0126fd..83045ca 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -210,8 +210,11 @@ int udp_lib_get_port(struct sock *sk, unsigned short snum,
>  		inet_get_local_port_range(&low, &high);
>  		remaining = (high - low) + 1;
>  
> +again:
>  		rand = net_random();
>  		first = (((u64)rand * remaining) >> 32) + low;
> +		if (inet_is_reserved_local_port(first))
> +			goto again;
>  		/*
>  		 * force rand to be an odd multiple of UDP_HTABLE_SIZE
>  		 */

Unless I misread the patch, you are checking only the 'first' port that
udp_lib_get_port() chose.

I would use inet_get_local_reserved_ports(&min_res, &max_res);
and check every port that we chose in the loop to avoid it if necessary.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html