[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B6915B7.4080806@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:20:39 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the net tree
Hello,
On 02/03/2010 02:38 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in
> net/ipv6/proc.c between commit 5833929cc2ad2b3064b4fac8c44e293972d240d8
> ("net: constify MIB name tables") from the net tree and commit
> d3f5fa4075414c7754126fbdc7c8fbd3906db7c8 ("percpu: add __percpu sparse
> annotations to net") from the percpu tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
>
> Maybe you guys could send Linus a simple one line patch for v2.6.33 that
> adds
>
> #define __percpu
>
> to include/linux/compiler.h (unconditionally) and then farm out the
> patches that add the __percpu annotations to other maintainers.
How about just adding dummy #define __percpu in each tree? I don't
think git will have much problem merging them.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists