[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B7012CD.8030108@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:34:05 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, jonathan@...masters.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.33] conntrack: restrict runtime hashsize modifications
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 11:00:03AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> Actually it doesn't seem like much more work to allow changing
>> table size, the main problem is that sysfs module parameters
>> don't seem to fit into the network namespace model at all.
>
> Well, they "fit" as they're global because modules are global.
> So we can make every netns hashtable size equals to module param,
> or make it bounded by module param
> or make initial hashtable size and not bounded
> or million other things.
Feel free to suggest your preferred method.
>> Please be more specific about your suspected slowdowns.
>
> I meant net->ct.htable_size in hash functions _if_ you're not allowing
> changing it from inside netns.
>
>> What's "everything"? What's different about the hashsize
>> compared to the many members we already moved to per-netns
>> structs?
>
> But whatever. I think per-netns hashtable size shouldn't be done
> that late.
This is a regression. You can not simply disable resizing and call
it a bugfix.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists