netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/4] C/R: Basic support for network namespaces and devices (v3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:31:02 -0800
From:	Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>
To:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc:	containers@...ts.osdl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] C/R: Basic support for network namespaces and devices (v3)

SH> I think that's be better.  Right now if we checkpoint a container
SH> with macvlan restart will be bogus, right?  We're trying to avoid
SH> any cases where we can't tell, at checkpoint, that restart won't
SH> be right.

Depends on your definition of bogus, and the situation, but okay.

SH> What I was asking is should do_veth_message() be in drivers/net/veth.c?

Well, we could add another ndo_* function to the net device, I guess,
but I'd be afraid we'd hit some cases where that wasn't sufficient.
Maybe it would be best to generalize that bit after I've added macvlan
(,etc) support so we have a good idea of what else would be needed?

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: danms@...ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html