[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1265868768.3061.15.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:12:48 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications
using fixed port numbers
Octavian, please resubmit all patches to lkml, netdev, David, because
patches 1 & 2 are changing kernel core services.
However, I'll take some time in a couple of hours to review them.
Le jeudi 11 février 2010 à 04:53 +0200, Octavian Purdila a écrit :
> This patch introduces /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports
> (bitmap type) which allows users to reserve ports for third-party
> applications.
>
> The reserved ports will not be used by automatic port assignments
> (e.g. when calling connect() or bind() with port number 0). Explicit
> port allocation behavior is unchanged.
>
> +extern unsigned long sysctl_local_reserved_ports[65536/8/sizeof(unsigned long)];
I am sure we have a special macro for this.
extern DECLARE_BITMAP(reserved_ports, 65536);
> +unsigned long sysctl_local_reserved_ports[65536/BITS_PER_LONG];
> +
Same point here, plus I am not sure adding 8192 bytes in BSS zone is a
problem nowadays. (It was ten years ago for some arches)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists