[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100211082044.GE14210@bicker>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:20:45 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Abhishek Kulkarni <adkulkar@...il.iu.edu>,
Venkateswararao Jujjuri <jvrao@...ibm.com>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] 9p: fix return value of rdma_request()
rdma_request() is supposed to return negative values on error. This change
means that if a kmalloc() fails it returns -ENOMEM. The original code returned
certain negative values, zero on success and zero on kmalloc() failures.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
---
I was just reading the code and I noticed this bug. I haven't tested it because I
don't have the hardware.
diff --git a/net/9p/trans_rdma.c b/net/9p/trans_rdma.c
index 2c95a89..589e340 100644
--- a/net/9p/trans_rdma.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_rdma.c
@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static int rdma_request(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req)
struct p9_trans_rdma *rdma = client->trans;
struct ib_send_wr wr, *bad_wr;
struct ib_sge sge;
- int err = 0;
+ int err = -ENOMEM;
unsigned long flags;
struct p9_rdma_context *c = NULL;
struct p9_rdma_context *rpl_context = NULL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists