lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20100212.115552.166740353.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:55:52 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com Cc: krkumar2@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com Subject: Re: ixgbe: [RFC] [PATCH] Fix return of invalid txq From: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com> Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:53:15 -0800 > Either way works though. I still think the table is the better way > to go, because of the determinism for any system and NIC > configuration/layout. The overhead of configuring the table is > taken during open(), so it's not in the hotpath at all. How many minus operations can your cpu perform in the same amount of time it takes to access memory? :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists