[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100212.115552.166740353.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:55:52 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com
Cc: krkumar2@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Subject: Re: ixgbe: [RFC] [PATCH] Fix return of invalid txq
From: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:53:15 -0800
> Either way works though. I still think the table is the better way
> to go, because of the determinism for any system and NIC
> configuration/layout. The overhead of configuring the table is
> taken during open(), so it's not in the hotpath at all.
How many minus operations can your cpu perform in the same amount
of time it takes to access memory? :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists