netdev - Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: move am79c961's probe function to .devinit.text

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100212.121110.181928763.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:11:10 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de
Cc:	gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 12o3l@...cali.nl,
	rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: move am79c961's probe function to
 .devinit.text

From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 21:06:38 +0100

> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 12:05:01PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
>> Date: Thu,  4 Feb 2010 20:56:57 +0100
>> 
>> > @David Miller: this patch is in patchwork with State: Not Applicable.
>> > Does that mean that netdev isn't the right tree for this patch?
>> 
>> I was under the impression that someone would pick up the
>> whole set as a unit.
> Ah, OK.  I hope Greg does exactly that now.

I've tossed this into my net-next-2.6 tree anyways to make sure it
doesn't get lost.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html