[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100213173911.GA5040@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:39:11 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost-net: switch to smp barriers
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 06:49:39PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 07:37:49 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 07:21:02PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > vhost-net only uses memory barriers to control SMP effects
> > > (communication with userspace potentially running on a different CPU),
> > > so it should use SMP barriers and not mandatory barriers for memory
> > > access ordering, as suggested by Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> >
> >
> > Rusty, any feedback on this one?
> > Thanks!
>
> Yep. barrier() is correct on UP to guard against preemption.
>
> Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
>
> Thanks,
> Rusty.
Dave, I see it's marked "not applicable":
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/44207/
the patch applies to net-next as of
b3b3f04fb587ecb61b5baa6c1c5f0e666fd12d73.
Can this be queued up please?
Should I resubmit with Rusty's ack?
Thanks!
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists