netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/3] sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:58:20 +0200
From:	Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
To:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Developers <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/3] sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code

On Tuesday 16 February 2010 09:48:56 you wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 February 2010 10:41:07 you wrote:
> > > +
> > > +     if (!write && !first && left && !err)
> > > +             err = proc_put_newline(&buffer, &left);
> > > +     if (write && !err)
> > > +             err = proc_skip_wspace(&buffer, &left);
> > > +     if (err == -EFAULT /* do we really need to check for -EFAULT? */
> > > || +         (write && first))
> > > +             return err ? : -EINVAL;
> >
> > The logic here seems messy, adding one or two goto's may help?
> 
> OK, I'll give it a try.
> 

After a couple of tries which didn't make it clearer, I've given up. Maybe its 
not clear, but is not too terribly messy IMO. I'll rather spend time on 
getting the new list range format done.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html