netdev - Re: linux-next: Tree for February 18 (netfilter)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B7D7617.9070600@oracle.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:17:11 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for February 18 (netfilter)

On 02/18/10 09:03, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 02/18/10 01:49, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20100217:
>>>
>>> The net tree lost its build failure but gained a conflict against the kvm
>>> tree.
>>
>>
>> include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h:94: error: field 'ct_general' has incomplete type
>> include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h:178: error: 'const struct sk_buff' has no member named 'nfct'
>> include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h:185: error: implicit declaration of function 'nf_conntrack_put'
>> include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h:294: error: 'const struct sk_buff' has no member named 'nfct'
>> net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv4.c:45: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'nfct'
>> net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv4.c:46: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'nfct'
>>
>> CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK is not enabled
>> but CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4=y.  It is "select"ed by
>> NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_SOCKET and NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TPROXY,
>> both of which are enabled.
>>
>> Hm, NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_SOCKET depends on !NF_CONNTRACK || NF_CONNTRACK.
>> Maybe NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TPROXY needs to do that also.  No, that would
>> go against that config option's help text:
> 
> No, the problem is use of skb->nfct without CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK.
> 
> This patch should fix it.

Nope:

In file included from /lnx/src/NEXT/linux-next-20100218/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.h:4,
                 from /lnx/src/NEXT/linux-next-20100218/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_zones.h:4,
                 from /lnx/src/NEXT/linux-next-20100218/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv4.c:19:
/lnx/src/NEXT/linux-next-20100218/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h:94: error: field 'ct_general' has incomplete type
/lnx/src/NEXT/linux-next-20100218/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h: In function 'nf_ct_get':
/lnx/src/NEXT/linux-next-20100218/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h:178: error: 'const struct sk_buff' has no member named 'nfct'
/lnx/src/NEXT/linux-next-20100218/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h: In function 'nf_ct_put':
/lnx/src/NEXT/linux-next-20100218/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h:185: error: implicit declaration of function 'nf_conntrack_put'
/lnx/src/NEXT/linux-next-20100218/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h: In function 'nf_ct_is_untracked':
/lnx/src/NEXT/linux-next-20100218/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h:294: error: 'const struct sk_buff' has no member named 'nfct'
make[4]: *** [net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv4.o] Error 1


-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html