[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B7CFDE4.4010003@simula.no>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:44:20 +0100
From: Andreas Petlund <apetlund@...ula.no>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
CC: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
hannemann@...s.rwth-aachen.de, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
shemminger@...tta.com, william.allen.simpson@...il.com,
damian@....rwth-aachen.de, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 2/3] net: TCP thin linear timeouts
On 02/18/2010 09:41 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, David Miller wrote:
>
>> From: Andreas Petlund <apetlund@...ula.no>
>> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:40:41 +0100
>>
>>> @@ -341,6 +342,8 @@ struct tcp_sock {
>>> u16 advmss; /* Advertised MSS */
>>> u8 frto_counter; /* Number of new acks after RTO */
>>> u8 nonagle; /* Disable Nagle algorithm? */
>>> + u8 thin_lto : 1,/* Use linear timeouts for thin streams */
>>> + thin_undef : 7;
>>>
>>
>> There is now a gap of 3 unused bytes here in this critical
>> core TCP socket data structure.
>>
>> Please either find a way to avoid this hole, or document
>> it with a comment.
>
> There would be multiple bits free for use in both frto_counter and nonagle
> byte.
>
I was playing aroud with this setup:
=========
u8 nonagle : 4,/* Disable Nagle algorithm? */
thin_lto : 1,/* Use linear timeouts for thin streams */
thin_dupack : 1,/* Fast retransmit on first dupack */
thin_undef : 2;
=========
Do you think that would do the trick?
Regards,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists