| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:00:42 -0500
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: davem@...emloft.net, adobriyan@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...erus.ca>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] xfrm: Flushing empty SPD generates false events
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...erus.ca>
To see the effect make sure you have an empty SPD.
On window1 "ip xfrm mon" and on window2 issue "ip xfrm policy flush"
You get prompt back in window2 and you see the flush event on window1.
With this fix, you still get prompt on window1 but no event on window2.
Thanks to Alexey Dobriyan for finding a bug in earlier version
when using pfkey to do the flushing.
Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...erus.ca>
---
net/key/af_key.c | 7 +++++--
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 13 ++++++++++---
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 6 +++++-
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/key/af_key.c b/net/key/af_key.c
index c269ce6..a20d2fa 100644
--- a/net/key/af_key.c
+++ b/net/key/af_key.c
@@ -2735,8 +2735,11 @@ static int pfkey_spdflush(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, struct sadb_msg
audit_info.secid = 0;
err = xfrm_policy_flush(net, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN, &audit_info);
err2 = unicast_flush_resp(sk, hdr);
- if (err || err2)
- return err ? err : err2;
+ if (err || err2) {
+ if (err == -ESRCH) /* empty table - old silent behavior */
+ return 0;
+ return err;
+ }
c.data.type = XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN;
c.event = XFRM_MSG_FLUSHPOLICY;
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 4368e7b..d6eb16d 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -771,7 +771,8 @@ xfrm_policy_flush_secctx_check(struct net *net, u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audi
int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
{
- int dir, err = 0;
+ int dir, err = 0, cnt = 0;
+ struct xfrm_policy *dp;
write_lock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
@@ -789,8 +790,10 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
&net->xfrm.policy_inexact[dir], bydst) {
if (pol->type != type)
continue;
- __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
+ dp = __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
+ if (dp)
+ cnt++;
xfrm_audit_policy_delete(pol, 1, audit_info->loginuid,
audit_info->sessionid,
@@ -809,8 +812,10 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
bydst) {
if (pol->type != type)
continue;
- __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
+ dp = __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
+ if (dp)
+ cnt++;
xfrm_audit_policy_delete(pol, 1,
audit_info->loginuid,
@@ -824,6 +829,8 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
}
}
+ if (!cnt)
+ err = -ESRCH;
atomic_inc(&flow_cache_genid);
out:
write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index cd94a9d..ee04e6b 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -1679,8 +1679,12 @@ static int xfrm_flush_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
audit_info.sessionid = NETLINK_CB(skb).sessionid;
audit_info.secid = NETLINK_CB(skb).sid;
err = xfrm_policy_flush(net, type, &audit_info);
- if (err)
+ if (err) {
+ if (err == -ESRCH) /* empty table */
+ return 0;
return err;
+ }
+
c.data.type = type;
c.event = nlh->nlmsg_type;
c.seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
--
1.6.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists