netdev - Re: [RFC 1/2] sctp: convert hash list to RCU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100219081856.79ba7cf8@nehalam>
Date:	Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:18:56 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>,
	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] sctp: convert hash list to RCU

On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:58:25 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:55:21PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > This patch converts existing SCTP hash list to using RCU
> > rather than reader/writer lock. Also, get rid of no longer used
> > locking wrappers.
> > 
> > In future, the SCTP hash locking should be broken out from the
> > hash structure because of the wasted space for the hash locks
> > and associated holes. A single lock per hashlist is sufficient
> > now that RCU is used.
> > 
> > Compile tested only. I can't think of an SCTP stress application.
> > 
> > P.s: Some janitor ought to go through and remove the locking
> > macros here.
> 
> One question below about what looks to be mixing of RCU and RCU-bh
> read-side critical sections while waiting only for RCU grace periods.
> Unless I am missing something, this can result in memory corruption.
> 

Thanks, I copied the original locking which was broken there as well.


-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html