netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH v5 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201002201527.37643.opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Date:	Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:27:37 +0200
From:	Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
To:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Developers <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v5 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers

On Saturday 20 February 2010 10:20:53 you wrote:

> > +unsigned long *sysctl_local_reserved_ports;
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(sysctl_local_reserved_ports);
> > +
> 
> Sorry, this looks somewhat weird, why not just export
> inet_is_reserved_local_port()?
> 

My understanding is that if we do that than we won't be able to inline 
inet_is_reserved_local_port().  And as David said previously that will have a 
significant impact on performance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html