[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B82A7FF.9000801@simula.no>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:51:27 +0100
From: Andreas Petlund <apetlund@...ula.no>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@...ia.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"zimmermann@...s.rwth-aachen.de" <zimmermann@...s.rwth-aachen.de>,
"pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>,
"eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"Arnd.Hannemann@...s.rwth-aachen.de"
<Arnd.Hannemann@...s.rwth-aachen.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"shemminger@...tta.com" <shemminger@...tta.com>,
"william.allen.simpson@...il.com" <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>,
"damian@....rwth-aachen.de" <damian@....rwth-aachen.de>,
"ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/3] net: TCP thin-stream detection
On 22. feb. 2010 16:17, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@...ia.com> writes:
>
>> If it's off by default there is no issue.
>
> Still a sufficient large number of people might turn it on
> and then the network would melt.
>
> IMHO TCP changes with badly understood congestion behaviour
> should not be merged until the necessary analysis/simulation etc.
> is done.
>
> -Andi
>
I also encourage you to read the discussions from the first posted
version of the patch set, since I here reference a lot of the
supporting research and related material from other researchers.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/141394
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/141395
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/141396
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/141397
Cheers,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists