netdev - Re: tuntap with tun_no

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1bf329b2b4fe8fca4f4ea16874643c11@chewa.net>
Date:	Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:51:44 +0100
From:	Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@...lab.net>
To:	andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tuntap with tun_no_pi and X25 question


On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:52:27 +1100, andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@...il.com>
wrote:
> The 0x40 and 0x60 comes from the first byte of the IP which has the
> version there?

Yes.

> With X.25 the first byte changes depending on the call sequence, so it
> cant be detected and set in the same way.

Then you need to use PI. That's what it's meant for.

-- 
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net
http://fi.linkedin.com/in/remidenis

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html