netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH v5 2/3] sysctl: add proc_do_large

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B85CFB4.5030908@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:17:40 +0800
From:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To:	Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Developers <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v5 2/3] sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap

Octavian Purdila wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 February 2010 07:24:00 you wrote:
>> Octavian Purdila wrote:
>>> Here is a new version of this patch which fixes both the comma and
>>> invalid value issues, please give it a try.
>> Sorry, it is even worse. :(
>>
>>> [net-next PATCH v5 2/3] sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap
>>>
>>> The new function can be used to read/write large bitmaps via /proc. A
>>> comma separated range format is used for compact output and input
>>> (e.g. 1,3-4,10-10).
>> Writing "50000-50100" gets EINVAL, it should be success.
>> Writing "50000,50100" fails too.
>>
> 
> Hmm, they don't fail for me :-/
> 
>> Please, at least, do some basic testing.
>>
> 
> I do test them, I've attached the current test batch I was using.
> 
> Anyways, today I've noticed that "1,2 3" does not fail and even more 
> importantly the final value is "3". 
> 
> Being that I don't see a way of fixing this without not acknowledging 1,2 even 
> though we will do set these values, I revisited the "1 2 3" issue. And I don't 
> understand why this is actually an issue, we are just being more permissive 
> (i.e. we are allowing as separators both whitespaces and ,).
> 
> 

Oops, after rechecking my test case, it is actually my test case's
fault. Sorry for this. I will fix my test case and run it again.


> 
> I will resend the whole patch series once we get this formatting issue 
> resolved.
> 

Thanks much!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html