[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100226100102.0d52c6e9@nehalam>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:01:02 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>, bridge@...ux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Denis Lunev <den@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] bridge - introduce via_phys_dev feature
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:39:59 +0300
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org> wrote:
> Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 08:18:43AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >> Looking back at this. What if the API was simpler:
>
> Thanks for the reply, Stephen!
>
> >> Why not:
> >> 1. Setup bridge (and any other interfaces except eth0); includes bringing br0 up
> >> 2. Add eth0 to bridge with new flag to inherit
> >> a. brctl addif br0 eth0 inherit
> >>
> >> Inherit functionality would need to move address (Ether, IP, IPv6)
> >> and routes from eth0 to br0.
> >> I will see about doing it as much as possible in userspace.
> >>
>
> Solution is good, but we'll have to reconfigure netfilter matches
> that check for device name/ifindex and restore all this back when
> deleting eth0 from br0.
Netfilter is outside of this, and can't really migrate easily.
> Maybe it's better to implement it on the kernel side by sending a
> netdev notification and letting the subsystem reconfigure themselves?
>
> And what can we do with existing TCP connections bound to a device?
>
TCP connections are never really bound to device. TCP routing is
flexible; if packets can get through, it doesn't care.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists