netdev - Re: Gianfar driver failing on MPC8641D based board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100226213825.GA32363@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date:	Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:38:25 +0300
From:	Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
To:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc:	Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
	Sandeep Gopalpet <Sandeep.Kumar@...escale.com>,
	davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: Gianfar driver failing on MPC8641D based board

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:27:42AM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On 10-02-26 11:10 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 03:34:07PM +0000, Martyn Welch wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Out of 10 boot attempts, 7 failed.
> > 
> > OK, I see why. With ip=on (dhcp boot) it's much harder to trigger
> > it. With static ip config can I see the same.
> 
> I'd kind of expected to see us stuck in gianfar on that lock, but
> the SysRQ-T doesn't show us hung up anywhere in gianfar itself.
> [This was on a base 2.6.33, with just a small sysrq fix patch]

> [df841a30] [c0009fc4] __switch_to+0x8c/0xf8                                     
> [df841a50] [c0350160] schedule+0x354/0x92c                                      
> [df841ae0] [c0331394] rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x2c/0x54                           
> [df841af0] [c0350eb0] __wait_on_bit+0x9c/0x108                                  
> [df841b10] [c0350fc0] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0xa4/0xb4                         
> [df841b40] [c0331cf0] __rpc_execute+0x16c/0x398                                 
> [df841b90] [c0329abc] rpc_run_task+0x48/0x9c                                    
> [df841ba0] [c0329c40] rpc_call_sync+0x54/0x88                                   
> [df841bd0] [c015e780] nfs_proc_lookup+0x94/0xe8                                 
> [df841c20] [c014eb60] nfs_lookup+0x12c/0x230                                    
> [df841d50] [c00b9680] do_lookup+0x118/0x288                                     
> [df841d80] [c00bb904] link_path_walk+0x194/0x1118                               
> [df841df0] [c00bcb08] path_walk+0x8c/0x168                                      
> [df841e20] [c00bcd6c] do_path_lookup+0x74/0x7c                                  
> [df841e40] [c00be148] do_filp_open+0x5d4/0xba4                                  
> [df841f10] [c00abe94] do_sys_open+0xac/0x190                                    

Yeah, I don't think this is gianfar-related. It must be something
else triggered by the fact that gianfar no longer sends stuff.

OK, I think I found what's happening in gianfar.

Some background...

start_xmit() prepares new skb for transmitting, generally it does
three things:

1. sets up all BDs (marks them ready to send), except the first one.
2. stores skb into tx_queue->tx_skbuff so that clean_tx_ring()
   would cleanup it later.
3. sets up the first BD, i.e. marks it ready.

Here is what clean_tx_ring() does:

1. reads skbs from tx_queue->tx_skbuff
2. Checks if the *last* BD is ready. If it's still ready [to send]
   then it it isn't transmitted, so clean_tx_ring() returns.
   Otherwise it actually cleanups BDs. All is OK.

Now, if there is just one BD, code flow:

- start_xmit(): stores skb into tx_skbuff. Note that the first BD
  (which is also the last one) isn't marked as ready, yet.
- clean_tx_ring(): sees that skb is not null, *and* its lstatus
  says that it is NOT ready (like if BD was sent), so it cleans
  it up (bad!)
- start_xmit(): marks BD as ready [to send], but it's too late.

We can fix this simply by reordering lstatus/tx_skbuff writes.

It works flawlessly on my p2020, please try it.

Thanks!


diff --git a/drivers/net/gianfar.c b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
index 8bd3c9f..cccb409 100644
--- a/drivers/net/gianfar.c
+++ b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
@@ -2021,7 +2021,6 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 	}
 
 	/* setup the TxBD length and buffer pointer for the first BD */
-	tx_queue->tx_skbuff[tx_queue->skb_curtx] = skb;
 	txbdp_start->bufPtr = dma_map_single(&priv->ofdev->dev, skb->data,
 			skb_headlen(skb), DMA_TO_DEVICE);
 
@@ -2053,6 +2052,10 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 
 	txbdp_start->lstatus = lstatus;
 
+	eieio(); /* force lstatus write before tx_skbuff */
+
+	tx_queue->tx_skbuff[tx_queue->skb_curtx] = skb;
+
 	/* Update the current skb pointer to the next entry we will use
 	 * (wrapping if necessary) */
 	tx_queue->skb_curtx = (tx_queue->skb_curtx + 1) &
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html