[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m13a0nwu6p.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:42:06 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
Cc: hadi@...erus.ca, Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing control.
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com> writes:
>>> Yet another set of per-namespace IDs along with CLONE_NEWXXX ones?
>>> I currently have a way to create all namespaces we have with one
>>> syscall. Why don't we have an ability to enter them all with one syscall?
>>
>> The CLONE_NEWXXX series of bits has been an royal pain to work with,
>> and it appears to be unnecessary complications for no gain.
>
> That's the answer for the "Yet another set..." question.
> How about the "Why don't we have..." one?
I am not certain which question you are asking:
Why don't we have an ability to enter all namespaces with one syscall
invocation?
Why don't we have a syscall that allows us to enter every namespace?
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists