[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1267228162.2224.38.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:49:22 -0800
From: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] ethtool: Add n-tuple string length to
drvinfo and return it
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 05:56 -0800, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On 02/26/2010 06:54 AM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > From: Peter Waskiewicz<peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
> >
> > The drvinfo struct should include the number of strings that
> > get_rx_ntuple will return. It will be variable if an underlying
> > driver implements its own get_rx_ntuple routine, so userspace
> > needs to know how much data is coming.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr<peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher<jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> > ---
> >
> > include/linux/ethtool.h | 1 +
> > net/core/ethtool.c | 3 +++
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> (resending reply, standard patch-sending box is having trouble sending
> to vger)
>
>
> As noted in the other email, your patch breaks ABI. The proper path is
> to decrease the size of reserved struct member, and NOT shift the offset
> of other members.
>
>
>
> However, perhaps consider the following patch for returning n-tuple
> count, for four reasons:
>
> 1) space in ethtool_drvinfo is limited
>
> 2) the patch below permits trivial string set addition, without
> ABI changes beyond adding a new ETH_SS_xxx constant.
>
> 3) the patch below permits direct access to ops->get_sset_count(),
> rather than implicit access via ethtool_drvinfo
>
> 4) ethtool_drvinfo interface does not permit indication of
> ops->get_sset_count() failure, versus returning zero value. The
> patch below does so, via output sset_mask.
>
> WARNING: this patch is compile-tested only.
>
> NOTE: I added a cosmetic fix to ETHTOOL_[GS]RXNTUPLE constants, making
> their indentation consistent with the rest of the list of constants.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>
I'm updating your patch since I found an issue. The mask is passing in
the ETH_SS_* flags, but then they're treated as bits, not enumerated
flags. I'm thinking of the best non-intrusive way to correct it.
-PJ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists