[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1267288154.9082.23.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:29:14 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: "\"Oleg A. Arkhangelsky\"" <sysoleg@...dex.ru>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/2] mq: support for bonding
Le samedi 27 février 2010 à 16:27 +0300, "Oleg A. Arkhangelsky" a
écrit :
>
> Make bonding driver multiqueue aware.
>
I wish it could be true :)
> Signed-off-by: Oleg A. Arkhangelsky <sysoleg@...dex.ru>
>
> ---
>
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 430c022..ea4ff33 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -4928,8 +4928,9 @@ int bond_create(struct net *net, const char *name)
>
> rtnl_lock();
>
> - bond_dev = alloc_netdev(sizeof(struct bonding), name ? name : "",
> - bond_setup);
> + bond_dev = alloc_netdev_mq(sizeof(struct bonding), name ? name : "",
> + bond_setup,
> + min_t(u32, BOND_MAX_TX_QUEUES, num_online_cpus()));
> if (!bond_dev) {
> pr_err("%s: eek! can't alloc netdev!\n", name);
> res = -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
> index 257a7a4..4a6cfb4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #define DRV_DESCRIPTION "Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver"
>
> #define BOND_MAX_ARP_TARGETS 16
> +#define BOND_MAX_TX_QUEUES 8
>
> #define IS_UP(dev) \
> ((((dev)->flags & IFF_UP) == IFF_UP) && \
>
> ---
>
Hi Oleg
1) Could you explain why this arbitrary value (8) was chosen ?
My dev machine has 16 cpus, and my network card has 16 queues per NIC
2) This multi queue support is not a real one, since bond driver is
currently using a per device central lock (bond->lock and
bond->curr_slave_lock).
Every xmit has to get this lock(s) and performance is not optimal.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists