lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:44:10 -0700
From:	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
Cc:	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...taire.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	Moni Shoua <monis@...taire.COM>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] infiniband: convert to use netdev_for_each_mc_addr

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:38:37AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:

> >The problem this statement is trying to solve had to do with bonding
> >creating multicast addresess for ethernet rather than infiniband in
> >some cases. This happens because bonding makes a device that switches
> >from ethernet to infiniband during its lifetime. I'm not quite
> >sure what kind of life cycle those addresses go through, but if they
> >somehow stay on the mc_list then ipoib_mcast_addr_is_valid will still
> >need to have the check.

> Ok I see your point now. But in this case, the length check should be in all
> drivers because if for example bonding device changes from infiniband back to
> eth, the addresses stored would be "cut" to 6 bytes and would make no sense.

Ideally, but the other wrinkle is due to other problems in the ipoib
driver one bad multicast address blocks further addresses from being
processed - effectively rendering the interface useless for
multicast. Ethernet drivers will just subscribe to a bogus address, no
real harm done.

I would prefer to see the check remain in ipoib until we can see
through testing that it is no longer triggering.

> 2) when bonding changes it's type, flush mc addresses and start over.
> 
> Second option looks nicer to me, but I might be missing something, thouths?

There was a patch posted that tried to do something like what you are
describing:
From: Moni Shoua <monis@...taire.COM>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] bonding: remap muticast addresses without using dev_close() and dev_open()

Thanks,
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists