netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH] accounting for socket backlog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1267409827.23196.44.camel@debian>
Date:	Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:17:07 +0800
From:	Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@...el.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] accounting for socket backlog

On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 21:12 +0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Well, if you have one processor, and a process doesnt want to yield
> the cpu (apart of sofirq of course that is filling the backlog while
> your process tries to empty it), your machine is dead. This is
> critical too :) 

If you only have one CPU, this won't happen. Because while the receiver
is busy processing the backlog, no senders will have the chance to be
scheduled to Tx more. And with the limited backlog, it won't take long
for the receiver to finish processing all the frames in the backlog.

Thanks,
-yi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html