| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1267572612.2839.70.camel@edumazet-laptop> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:30:12 +0100 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, werner@...ane.dyn-o-saur.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.33 problems Le mardi 02 mars 2010 à 14:42 -0800, Stephen Hemminger a écrit : > The SNMP MIB stuff does allocate a disproportionately large amount of percpu > data. Looks like 2 tables per MIB. But did this percpu usage grew with 2.6.33 ? In my understanding, ipv6 always wanted a lot of percpu data for its MIBS (including per device MIBS), the big increase occurred with commit 96793b482540f3a26e2188eaf75cb56b7829d3e3 from David L Stevens, when RFC 4293 was implemented. On IPV6, each net device needed 4096/8192 additional bytes of memory per possible cpu. An attempt to reduce SNMP mibs by 50% was attempted one ago, but not completed. I'll try to find some time to resurrect the patch. [RFC] percpu: convert SNMP mibs to new infra (use one single table, for both user/bh contexts on x86) http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/1/401 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists