netdev - Re: [PATCH] bridge: per-cpu packet statistics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1267515832.2843.7.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:43:52 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]  bridge: per-cpu packet statistics

Le lundi 01 mars 2010 à 16:16 -0800, Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
> +static void br_dev_free(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct net_bridge *br = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +	free_percpu(br->stats);
> +}
> +
>  void br_dev_setup(struct net_device *dev)
>  {
>  	random_ether_addr(dev->dev_addr);
>  	ether_setup(dev);
>  
>  	dev->netdev_ops = &br_netdev_ops;
> -	dev->destructor = free_netdev;
> +	dev->destructor = br_dev_free;
>  	SET_ETHTOOL_OPS(dev, &br_ethtool_ops);

Isnt free_netdev() missing after this change ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html