| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4B8D0E2E.6020205@free.fr> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:10:06 +0100 From: Cedric Le Goater <legoater@...e.fr> To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com> CC: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>, Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Netfilter Development Mailinglist <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>, Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing control. On 03/01/2010 10:42 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > I am of two mind about my patches. Right now they are a brilliant > proof of concept that we can name namespaces without needing a > namespace for the names of namespaces, and start to be a practical > solution to the join problem. At the same time, I'm not certain > I like a solution that requires yet more syscalls so I ask myself > is there not yet a simpler way. thinking aloud, what if you made the nsproxy a vfs_inode ? we could then mount the nsfs to do all sorts of fs operations on the object, like notifying easily its deletion. we would need to find a meaningful name, probably the inode number. one syscall (nsfd) would be required to get the nsproxy of a task (pid). you can't guess that from an inode number. C. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists