[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.01.1003021613570.17303@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:14:23 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, hadi@...erus.ca,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing
control.
On Tuesday 2010-03-02 16:03, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> I agree with all the points you and Pavel you talked about but I don't
>> feel comfortable to have the current process to switch the pid namespace
>> because of the process tree hierarchy (what will be the parent of the
>> process when you enter the pid namespace for example).
>
>The answer is - the one, that used to be. I see no problems with it.
>Do you?
But perhaps it could be named "namespacefd" instead of nsfd, to reduce
potential clashes (because glibc will usually just use the same name
when making the syscall available as a C function).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists