netdev - Re: NETIF_F_FRAGLIST and NETIF_F

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:40:24 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc:	mekaviraj@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NETIF_F_FRAGLIST and NETIF_F_SG difference

From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:58:41 +0000

> (I don't know why there are two ways of adding extra data.  The latter
> does not seem to be used often.)

It's the most efficient way to handle IPv4/IPv6 fragmentation and
reassembly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html