[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:48:29 +0200 (EET)
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To: Alexander Zimmermann <zimmermann@...s.rwth-aachen.de>
cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi J?rvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TCP Appropriate Byte Counting per default off
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Alexander Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi David, hi Ilpo,
>
> I wonder why ABC is off per default? What are the reasons?
> Should we turn it on per default?
>
> From algorithmic point of view I see no flaws just
> benefits.
>
> With RFC5681 ABC is recommended.
> OSX uses ABC per default.
As Alexey once put it, ABC is very BSD specific algorithm.
Out of two goals of ABC, protection against split ACKs is achieved in
Linux by other means (see tcp_clean_rtx_queue and flags it gives to
elsewhere). Thus, you can kind of think that we do APC already :-). The
other part, faster increase during slow start, isn't currently done though
it would be relatively simple to implement (I think I even have some,
possibly unfinished, patch to do that lying around somewhere I wrote
someday).
ABC is not that necessary when window is counted in packets. And besides
that, it was found to somewhat hurt small segment flows. There are some
messages in archives in the timeframe ABC was disabled (plus there might
have been some even older than that).
--
i.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists