[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100304031847.GA22683@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 04:18:47 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: rdunlap@...otime.net, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] bridge: depends on INET
* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:08:23 -0800
>
> > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> >
> > br_multicast calls ip_send_check(), so it should depend on INET.
> >
> > built-in:
> > br_multicast.c:(.text+0x88cf4): undefined reference to `ip_send_check'
> >
> > or modular:
> > ERROR: "ip_send_check" [net/bridge/bridge.ko] undefined!
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
>
> Applied, but I almost lost this patch.
>
> You need to CC: netdev on all networking patches so that it
> gets properly tracked in patchwork and therefore does not get
> lost.
I suspect Randy went by the MAINTAINERS entry - you might want to add netdev
as a second 'L:' line:
ETHERNET BRIDGE
M: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
L: bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
W: http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Net:Bridge
S: Maintained
F: include/linux/netfilter_bridge/
F: net/bridge/
To make it really clear that netdev must be Cc:-ed for those patches.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists