[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DA586906BA1FFC4384FCFD6429ECE860A45A6BAE@shzsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:21:48 +0800
From: "Zhu, Yi" <yi.zhu@...el.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@...core.fi>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 2/7] tcp: use limited socket backlog
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Then its a separate bug. MD5 support added so many bugs its not even
> funny.
> Existing bugs are not an excuse for adding new ones, we try the reverse.
> No ?
Can you show me where sk_drops is used by TCP and what SNMP MIB value
should I use for backlog dropping? TCP_MIB_INERRS doesn't seem correct.
Thanks,
-yi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists