[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B92695F.60601@computer.org>
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:40:31 +0100
From: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@...puter.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
CC: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Roger Quadros <ext-roger.quadros@...ia.com>,
Bing Zhao <bzhao@...vell.com>, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] bluetooth: debugfs changes use too much stack
Dan Carpenter wrote:
Error handling?
> The original code would break with a 4K stack.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
> ---
> This was compile tested only. Sorry about that.
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sysfs.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sysfs.c
> index 1a79a6c..835758f 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sysfs.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sysfs.c
> @@ -417,9 +417,11 @@ static ssize_t inquiry_cache_read(struct file *file, char __user *userbuf,
> struct hci_dev *hdev = file->private_data;
> struct inquiry_cache *cache = &hdev->inq_cache;
> struct inquiry_entry *e;
> - char buf[4096];
> + char *buf;
> int n = 0;
> + ssize_t ret;
>
> + buf = kmalloc(4096, GFP_KERNEL);
Could this kmalloc not fail?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists