netdev - Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] Make functions of dev_<level> macros, recursive vsnprintf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003061540470.23804@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:46:45 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Andrew <nick@...k-andrew.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] Make functions of dev_<level> macros, recursive
 vsnprintf



On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Joe Perches wrote:
> 
> I believe 32 bits isn't possible.
> 
> type:6
> flags:8
> width:8
> base:6
> precision:6
> qualifier:8

type: 5
flags: 7
width: 5 (make it 6 bits and signed)
base: 5
precision: 5 (make it 6 bits, and signed)
qualifier: 3

Now, admittedly, right now 'qualifier' really has to be 8, but that's just 
because we use an ASCII character for it. But I don't think there are more 
than 8 actual legal qualifiers. And 'base' could be just 2 bits, since 
there are only a couple of legal bases, but I left room for them all 
anyway.

And the other really should fit in those numbers unchanged, I think. 

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html