[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100307014324.GA19589@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 09:43:24 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v2] net: consolidate netif_needs_gso()
checks
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 11:27:50AM -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
>
> It looks like dev_gso_segment() could be used to "Verify header
> integrity only" according to the comment? If this is true I think the
> logic should probably be
>
> if (netif_needs_gso(dev, skb)) {
> if (unlikely(dev_gso_segment(skb)))
> goto out_kfree_skb;
> if (skb->next)
> goto gso;
> } do your thing
>
>
>
> That way we linearize the skb if necessary in the case were
> dev_gso_segment() only verifies the header and does not return a list of
> segments.
If we needed to linearise the skb then dev_gso_segment should
perform the segmentation. Is there a case where it doesn't?
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists