lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100307111816.GC20004@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 13:18:16 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> To: xiaohui.xin@...el.com Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, jdike@...user-mode-linux.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] Provides multiple submits and asynchronous notifications. > +/* The structure to notify the virtqueue for async socket */ > +struct vhost_notifier { > + struct list_head list; > + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq; > + int head; > + int size; > + int log; > + void *ctrl; > + void (*dtor)(struct vhost_notifier *); > +}; > + So IMO, this is not the best interface between vhost and your driver, exposing them to each other unnecessarily. If you think about it, your driver should not care about this structure. It could get e.g. a kiocb (sendmsg already gets one), and call ki_dtor on completion. vhost could save it's state in ki_user_data. If your driver needs to add more data to do more tracking, I think it can put skb pointer in the private pointer. -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists